Digital Transformation in the OSS/BSS Space

2022-08-23 16:28:28
关注

Illustration: © IoT For All

Not long ago, operating a telecommunications network was a static, slow-changing process. Networks were built using physical functions, configured to provide a stable set of services and, once rolled out, to operate for many years without significant changes. This also reflected upon the operations and business support systems, the OSS/BSS, which would unavoidably acquire legacy status after several years in operation. Today, changes that were previously done manually via CLI are now fully automated and replicated at scale for increasingly faster deployment times, better SLAs, and an enhanced customer experience. Any legacy OSS/BSS will most likely not have the flexibility and the automation capabilities to support it, therefore digital transformation initiatives are actively targeting this crucial set of systems that need to be brought up to speed with the new trends.

'Any legacy OSS/BSS will most likely not have the flexibility and the automation capabilities to support digital transformation, therefore initiatives are actively targeting this crucial set of systems.' -WaylayClick To Tweet

OSS/BSS

The complexity that inherently accompanies the new approach reflects upon all layers, from infrastructure to the OSS/BSS. There is, however, a catch. Changing the OSS/BSS layer is often a multi-million dollar project that spans over several years, touches on all active parts of the network, and usually begins with the migration of all legacy inventories to the new system before a single new service can be rolled out. It creates a dependency on specific vendors and is not something most CSPs or MNOs are looking forward to. 

So, is there an equally reliable, less intrusive, and more pragmatic alternative? Everything is ultimately possible in software, and I believe there is a way, loosely inspired by two concepts borrowed from the field of software architecture: the service mesh and the sidecar.

Introducing a Companion Automation Layer

Enter the brown-field scenario of a CSP that has made a huge investment over the years and manages a heterogeneous, multi-vendor OSS/BSS ecosystem. The challenge of new product introduction is to avoid the bespoke development and integration effort associated with adapting each of the OSS/BSS components and with adding the glue logic that allows them to support the new use cases end-to-end.

What if, instead of touching upon all these systems or replacing them with a new one, we keep their existing functionality and federated inventories? We can do this by introducing a companion automation layer to the existing OSS/BSS stack, effectively creating a mesh between these systems and enabling them to participate in fully automated end-to-end transactions and accelerating digital transformation.

How will the Automation Layer Work?

This approach would bring all the digital transformation benefits to CSPs and allow them to start innovating immediately, without first going through an expensive OSS/BSS replacement exercise. Here is how.

  1. It bypasses the inventory migration conundrum, keeping the sources of truth with the systems that own them and consuming data directly from the source.

  2. An automation layer can centralize the automation flows for all the domains covered by the CSP’s network into a reusable, easy-to-extend catalog that spans from SDN and data center automation to 5G slicing and eSIM connectivity.

  3. It can easily bring in new and existing systems into the mesh by exposing their APIs and data to the automation layer, continuously expanding the automation scope towards new use cases. The automation layer acts as a sidecar to all these systems, enabling them to participate in automation scenarios even if they were not initially designed for it. Arguably, this is better than the initiative taken by many CSPs to expose all OSS/BSS APIs under a unified API gateway, which consolidates access but still lacks any automation capabilities.

  4. Coupled with concepts like low-code and no-code, an automation layer enables the CSP’s subject matter experts to define new services as end-to-end automation templates that seamlessly consume the APIs published by the different OSS/BSS components and apply NetOps principles to them.

  5. It provides a central point for operationalizing the AI/ML models used in assurance scenarios across all domains, enabling advanced assurance and closed-loop automation even across legacy systems.

  6. And last, it allows the CSP to expose the automation layer to their own MVNO customers in a controlled way, providing them with the means to customize the standard offerings or define new services on top of it.

CSPs and the Digital Transformation Journey

While introducing the new layer and new products, existing systems and services are kept running, allowing the CSP to determine exactly if, when, and how they will be migrated, with zero risk of downtime. Similarly, it is sufficient to expose the APIs of newly introduced components to the automation layer to have them included in the automation spectrum.

Tweet

Share

Share

Email

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Automation
  • Digital Transformation
  • Machine Learning
  • Telecommunications

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Automation
  • Digital Transformation
  • Machine Learning
  • Telecommunications

参考译文
在OSS/BSS空间中的数字转换
图示:© IoT For All —— 不久以前,运营电信网络仍是一项静态的、变化缓慢的过程。网络是通过物理功能构建的,配置为提供一组稳定的服务,一旦部署完成,通常多年内都不会发生重大变化。这也体现在运营支持系统和业务支持系统(OSS/BSS)上,它们在运行几年之后不可避免地会变成遗留系统。如今,原本通过命令行界面(CLI)手动完成的变更现在已实现完全自动化,并以规模方式复制,从而加快了部署速度,提高了服务等级协议(SLA),并提升了客户体验。任何遗留的OSS/BSS系统很可能缺乏灵活性和自动化能力来支持这一转型,因此数字化转型的举措正积极聚焦于这套关键系统,以尽快跟上新趋势。"任何遗留的OSS/BSS系统很可能缺乏灵活性和自动化能力来支持数字化转型,因此举措正积极聚焦于这套关键系统。" —— WaylayOSS/BSS伴随这一新方法而来的复杂性反映在所有层级上,从基础设施一直到OSS/BSS。然而,这里有一个关键问题。改造OSS/BSS层级通常是一个耗资数百万美元、持续数年、涉及网络所有活动部分的项目,并且在部署任何新服务之前,通常都要先将所有遗留库存迁移到新系统中。这会形成对特定供应商的依赖,而这是大多数通信服务提供商(CSP)或移动网络运营商(MNO)并不期待的。那么,是否存在同样可靠、干预性更低、更务实的替代方案呢?最终,一切都可以通过软件实现,我相信确实存在这样的方式,其灵感来源于软件架构领域的两个概念:服务网格和边车(sidecar)。引入一个辅助自动化层想象一下一个CSP的场景:它多年来投入巨大,管理着一个异构的、多供应商的OSS/BSS生态系统。新产品的推出面临的挑战,是避免为适应每个OSS/BSS组件而进行定制开发和集成工作,以及添加将它们连接起来以支持新用例的胶合逻辑(glue logic)。如果我们可以不改动这些系统,也不用全部替换为新系统,而是保留其现有功能和分散的库存呢?我们可以通过在现有OSS/BSS堆栈中引入一个辅助自动化层,有效地在这些系统之间创建一个网格,使它们能够参与完全自动化的端到端交易,从而加速数字化转型。自动化层将如何运作?这种方法将把数字化转型的全部优势带给CSP,并使他们无需首先经历耗资巨大的OSS/BSS替换过程,即可立即开始创新。具体如下:- 它绕过了库存迁移的难题,保留各系统的原始数据源,并直接从源头获取数据。- 自动化层可以将CSP网络中所有领域的自动化流程集中为一个可重用、易于扩展的目录,涵盖软件定义网络(SDN)和数据中心自动化,直到5G切片和eSIM连接。- 它能够通过暴露新旧系统的API和数据,将这些系统轻松纳入网格中,持续扩展自动化范围,以支持新的用例。- 自动化层充当所有这些系统的边车,即使它们最初并未设计用于自动化,也能够参与自动化场景。或许,这比许多CSP所采取的举措更加优越:即通过统一的API网关公开所有OSS/BSS API,这种方式虽然统一了访问入口,却仍然缺乏任何自动化能力。结合低代码和无代码等理念,自动化层使CSP的领域专家能够将新服务定义为端到端的自动化模板,这些模板无缝调用各个OSS/BSS组件发布的API,并应用NetOps原则。它提供了一个中央平台,用于在所有领域中操作AI/ML模型,用于保障(assurance)场景,从而实现先进的保障功能和闭环自动化,即使涉及遗留系统也不例外。最后,它允许CSP以受控的方式将其自动化层暴露给自己的移动虚拟网络运营商(MVNO)客户,为他们提供定制标准产品或在其基础上定义新服务的能力。CSP与数字化转型的旅程在引入新层和新产品的同时,现有系统和服务将继续运行,使CSP能够精确地决定是否、何时以及如何迁移这些系统,不会造成任何停机风险。同样,只需将新引入组件的API暴露给自动化层,即可将其纳入自动化范围。
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

广告
提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘